-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- January 2009
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: compatibility
Another adventure in downgrading: .NET 4.8 to .NET 4.6.2
Over the past few days I’ve had some fun with a codebase again. Similar to the time when I tried to get my Direct3D engine running on very early CPUs and GPUs. Except that codebase was in C++, and this … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged .NET 4.6.2, .NET 4.8, 2015 LTSB, C#, CLR, Common Language Runtime, compatibility, downgrade, longevity, LTSB, NAudio, NuGet, retro, Windows 10, Windows 10 2015 LTSB
2 Comments
When old and new meet: lessons from the past
As you may know, I like to dabble in retro-computing. I have held on to most computers I’ve used over the years, and I play with them from time to time. However, an interesting change has happened over the years: … Continue reading
Posted in Direct3D, Oldskool/retro programming, OpenGL, Software development
Tagged 3D, Amiga, assembly, C, C64, Commodore 64, compatibility, compiler, digital longevity, Direct3D, directx sdk, libraries, MS-DOS, oldskool, OpenGL, portability, retro, Windows SDK
2 Comments
Visual Studio versioning and compatibility
After the previous post on DirectX version information, I figured it would be useful to also give a quick overview of Visual Studio compatibility. Because not all versions of Visual Studio run on all versions of Windows, and neither does the … Continue reading
Posted in Oldskool/retro programming, Software development
Tagged API, compatibility, computer, programming, retro, software, technology, versioning, Visual Studio, visual studio 6
4 Comments
Direct3D versioning and compatibility
When I was playing with my PowerVR PCX2 card with old versions of Direct3D, I wrote down some notes to try and make the versioning of DirectX/Direct3D and the OS compatibility a bit more transparent. I’ll make a blogpost out … Continue reading
Be aware of the world around you
Now that we are nearing the release of Windows 8, I think it is a good time to talk about the changes in the world of technology in general, and how you deal with them. As a software developer, it … Continue reading
Posted in Direct3D, Software development
Tagged backward, compatibility, Direct3D, DirectX, directx 10, enterprise-it, forward, future, gaming, library, runtime, SDK, software, Vista, Windows, Windows 7
8 Comments
Scali's OpenBlog™ 